Barney Frank: Signature Bank’s closure was a message that “Crypto is toxic.”
Barney Frank’s Claims
An ex-congressman and the man behind the Dodd-Frank Act, Barney Frank, has said that Signature Bank was shuttered in part to attack the digital asset industry. The former lawmaker, who is also a Signature Bank board member, said that regulators targeted the bank to send an “anti-crypto message.”
Third-Largest Bank Failure in U.S. History
Signature Bank’s closure marks the third-largest bank failure in U.S. history. Regulators have not yet provided any further reasoning for shuttering the bank. The closure of Signature Bank has raised concerns about the stability of the banking industry in the United States. It remains to be seen how this will impact other banks and their customers.
Silicon Valley Bank’s Failure
The move came after Silicon Valley Bank—to which a number of crypto companies had exposure—went belly up after suffering a $42 billion bank run days before. Former Rep. Barney Frank said that the crypto panic caused a run on deposits at Signature Bank, but he says that the bank had already stabilized before New York state regulators shut down the crypto-friendly institution.
Frank insists things have calmed.
Frank insists things had calmed by the end of the weekend. “They closed us, even though there was no good, compelling reason to do that, because they wanted to show that banks shouldn’t be involved in crypto,” Frank, a Democrat, said in a telephone interview. According to the New York Department of Financial Services, Signature had $110.36 billion in total assets and $88.59 billion in deposits as of December 31. “They called the bank on Sunday and said ‘We’re coming over.’”
The closure of Signature Bank has raised many questions about the future of crypto-friendly banks and their relationship with regulators. Some people see this as an attack on digital assets and the role they play in traditional banking systems, but others say it’s just another example of regulatory oversight being used within its limits. No matter how you feel about this issue, it is clear that this event will have big effects on both traditional banks and those who work in the digital asset space.
—
Disclaimer: Please conduct your due diligence before you take any action related to the promoted company or any of its affiliates or services. Cryptopress® will not be responsible for any damage or loss caused by your use of content, goods, or services mentioned. Opinions and ideas expressed are those of their authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Cryptopress.site.
Related content
- Tassat Launches Digital Dollars™ and Real-Time Bank Payment Network Empowers banks to provide real-time, secure payments to their customers 24X7, 365 days a year. TassatPay™ real-time payments using DigitalDollars™ meet the requirements of banks regulated by the OCC, FDIC and NYSDFS and swiftly integrate with legacy banking systems. TassatPay™...
- What is Bitcoin’s Taproot upgrade? The decentralized currency market has been growing steadily over the last few years. As the first and major cryptocurrency, Bitcoin (BTC) is now widely used by investors who want to maintain total control of their own funds. But there is...
- FV Bank Becomes Principal Member of Visa. Set to Launch Cryptocurrency Linked Visa Card Programs FV Bank redefines banking with first vertically integrated banking, digital asset custody, and debit and credit card offerings PUERTO RICO Oct 29 2021 (Blockchain Wire) FV Bank (www.fvbank.us), the rapidly growing U.S. licensed global challenger bank and digital asset custodian, has announced that...
- Sofi Money: fintech strikes back? What is Sofi Money? SoFi Money is a cash management account that allows you to link your debit cards and bank accounts online. You can also receive tax refunds from big companies like Amazon or Uber right into your SoFi...